4.6 Article

A SOX9 defect of calmodulin-dependent nuclear import in campomelic dysplasia/autosomal sex reversal

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 36, 页码 33839-33847

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M302078200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During mammalian sex determination, SOX9 is translocated into the nuclei of Sertoli cells within the developing XY gonad. The N-terminal nuclear localization signal (NLS) is contained within a SOX consensus calmodulin (CaM) binding region, thereby implicating CaM in nuclear import of SOX9. By fluorescence spectroscopy and glutaraldehyde cross-linking, we show that the SOX9 HMG domain and CaM interact in vitro. The formation of a SOX9.CaM binary complex is calcium-dependent and is accompanied by a conformational change in SOX9. A CaM antagonist, calmidazolium chloride (CDZ), was observed to block CaM recognition of SOX9 in vitro and inhibit both nuclear import and consequent transcriptional activity of SOX9 in treated cells. The significance of the SOX9-CaM interaction was highlighted by analysis of a missense SOX9 mutation, A158T, identified from a XY female with campomelic dysplasia/autosomal sex reversal (CD/SRA). This mutant binds importin beta normally despite defective nuclear import. Fluorescence and quenching studies indicate that in the unbound state, the A158T mutant shows a similar conformation to that of the WT SOX9, but in the presence of CaM, the mutant undergoes unusual conformational changes. Furthermore, SOX9-mediated transcriptional activation by cells expressing the A158T mutant is more sensitive to CDZ than cells expressing WT SOX9. These results suggest first that CaM is involved in the nuclear transport of SOX9 in a process likely to involve direct interaction and second, that CD/SRA can arise, at least in part, from a defect in CaM recognition, ultimately leading to reduced ability of SOX9 to activate transcription of cartilage and testes-forming genes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据