4.0 Article

Effects of exercise and weight loss on cardiac risk factors associated with syndrome X

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 163, 期 16, 页码 1889-1895

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.163.16.1889

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01-RR-30] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL59672, HL49572] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Patients with high blood pressure (BP) often exhibit syndrome X, an aggregation of abnormalities in carbohydrate and lipoprotein metabolism associated with increased risk of coronary heart disease (CHD). The present study evaluated the effects of a 6-month intervention involving either aerobic exercise training alone (EX Only) or exercise combined with a structured weight loss program (EX+WL) on CHD risk factors associated with syndrome X. Methods: A total of 53 men and women were selected from a larger behavioral intervention trial, who showed the hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and high BP characteristic of syndrome X. Participants were randomly assigned to EX only (n = 21), EX + WL (n = 21), or a waiting list control group (n = 11). Before and following treatment, participants underwent measurement of glucose tolerance, lipid levels, and clinical BP. Results: Hyperinsulinemic responses to glucose challenge were significantly reduced in both the EX + WL group (P<.001) and the EX-only group (P=.003). Participants who showed the largest amount of weight loss showed the most robust improvements in abnormal insulin responses (EX + WL group, 47% reduction; EX-only group, 27% reduction). Diastolic BP was significantly reduced in the EX+WL group (96 +/- 4 to 87 +/- 5 nun Hg [mean +/- SD]; P=.01), but not in the EX-only group (93 +/- 4 to 89 +/- 5 mm Hg [mean +/- SD]; P=.08). Lipid profile was not significantly improved by either intervention. Conclusion: These results suggest that EX+WL is an effective treatment for hyperinsulinemia and lowering of diastolic BP in patients with the syndrome X.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据