3.9 Article

The Gel State of the Vitreous and Ascorbate-Dependent Oxygen Consumption

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 127, 期 4, 页码 475-482

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2008.621

关键词

-

资金

  1. Washington University Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness Senior Scientist award
  3. National Eye Institute [EY04853, EY15863]
  4. American Health Assistance Foundation
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [P41 RR00954, P60 DK20579, P30 DK56341]
  6. National Institutes of Health

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To investigate the rate and mechanism of oxygen consumption by the vitreous. Methods: Oxygen consumption was measured with a microrespirometer. Vitreous ascorbate was measured spectrophotometrically and by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Vitreous degeneration was related to the rate of oxygen consumption and ascorbate concentration in samples obtained during vitrectomy. Results: Prolonged exposure to oxygen or treatment with ascorbate oxidase eliminated oxygen consumption by the vitreous. Adding ascorbate restored oxygen consumption. Oxygen consumption persisted after boiling or treating the vitreous with the chelating agents EDTA and deferoxamine. In patients undergoing retinal surgery, liquefaction of the vitreous and previous vitrectomy were associated with decreased ascorbate concentration and lower oxygen consumption. Conclusions: Ascorbate in the vitreous decreases exposure of the lens to oxygen. The catalyst for this reaction is not known, although free iron may contribute. The gel state of the vitreous preserves ascorbate levels, thereby sustaining oxygen consumption. Vitrectomy or advanced vitreous degeneration may increase exposure of the lens to oxygen, promoting the progression of nuclear cataracts. Clinical Relevance: Determining how the eye is protected from nuclear cataracts should suggest treatments to reduce their incidence.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据