4.6 Article

Intramolecular interactions of the regulatory region with the catalytic core in the plasma membrane calcium pump

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 37, 页码 35798-35804

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M305794200

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM28835] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The access of three proteases to their sites of cleavage was used as a measure of regulatory interactions in the plasma membrane Ca2+ pump isoform 4b (PMCA4b). When the proteases could not cut at their sites in the C-terminal regulatory region, the interaction was judged to be tight. This was the case in the absence of Ca2+, when chymotrypsin and caspase cut PMCA only very slowly. Ca2+ accelerated the fragmentation, but the digestion remained incomplete. In the presence of Ca2+ plus calmodulin, the digestion became nearly complete in all cases, indicating a more flexible conformation of the carboxyl terminus in the fully activated state. The acceleration of proteolysis by Ca2+ or Ca2+ plus calmodulin occurred equally at the caspase site upstream of the calmodulin-binding domain and the chymotrypsin and calpain sites downstream of that domain. Replacing Trp(1093) (a key residue within the calmodulin-binding domain) with alanine had a much more specific effect, because it exposed only proteolytic sites within the calmodulin-binding domain that had previously been shielded in the native protein. At these sites, both calpain and chymotrypsin cut the Trp1093 3 Ala mutant in the absence of calmodulin. These data indicate that, in the auto-inhibited conformation, the calmodulin-binding/auto-inhibitory sequence and the regions both upstream and downstream are in close contact with the catalytic core. Trp1093 plays an essential role not only in stabilizing the Ca2+-calmodulin/calmodulin-binding domain complex but also in the formation or stability of the inhibitory conformation of that domain when it interacts with the catalytic core of PMCA4b.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据