3.9 Article

Fat Consumption and Its Association With Age-Related Macular Degeneration

期刊

ARCHIVES OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 127, 期 5, 页码 674-680

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.60

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health & Medical Research Council Public Health Scholarship
  2. National Health & Medical Research Council
  3. Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital Wagstaff fellowship
  4. National Health and Medical Research Council [209057, 251533, 396414]
  5. Ophthalmic Research Institute of Australia
  6. John Reid Charitable Trust
  7. Perpetual Trustees

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To evaluate associations between past dietary fat intake and the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Methods: Six thousand seven hundred thirty-four participants aged 58 to 69 years in 1990-1994 took part in this cohort study. Participants' nutrient intakes were estimated from a food frequency questionnaire at baseline. At follow-up from 2003 to 2006, digital macula photographs of both eyes were evaluated for early and late AMD signs. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios, with adjustment for age, smoking, and other potential confounders. Results: Higher trans-unsaturated fat intake was associated with an increased prevalence of late AMD; the odds ratio comparing the highest with the lowest quartile of trans fat was 1.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.92-3.37; P=.02). Higher omega-3 fatty acid intake (highest quartile vs lowest quartile) was inversely associated with early AMD (odds ratio, 0.85; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.02; P=.03). Olive oil intake (>= 100 mL/week vs <1 mL/week) was associated with decreased prevalence of late AMD (odds ratio, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.22-1.04 P=.03). No significant associations with AMD were observed for intakes of fish, total fat, butter, or margarine. Conclusion: A diet low in trans-unsaturated fat and rich in w-3 fatty acids and olive oil may reduce the risk of AMD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据