4.6 Article

Generalization of the shell model and correlation effects in strongly correlated oxides

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 68, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.125109

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct analytical and numerical calculation show that the two-electron atomic configuration can be unstable with respect to a static or dynamic displacement of the electron shells. This enables us to develop a so-called nonrigid shell model for a partial account of the intra-atomic electron correlations. In frames of the model a correlated state of two-electron molecular configuration is described by a set of symmetrized shell displacements similarly to the well-known shell model developed for a description of the lattice dynamics. The former relate to the latter as the optical phonon modes relate to the acoustical one. The effect under consideration is expected to be of particular importance for anionic 2p(6) background in oxides. The nonrigid anionic background forms an unconventional magnetoelectric system characterized by a set of independent orbital order parameters and competition of paramagnetic and diamagnetic responses. The model allows an introduction of the pseudospin formalism and effective spin Hamiltonian for a description of the short- and long-range ordering of nonrigid atomic backgrounds in crystals. We predict a number of unconventional correlation effects including: (i) a formation of polaronlike holes and charge-transfer excitons; (ii) the mechanism of the self-trapping for holes and/or charge-transfer excitons; (iii) a purely electronic (pseudo)Jahn-Teller effect due to a coupling between valent hole and a nonrigid anionic background; (iv) a combined (pseudo)Jahn-Teller effect provided by a joint account both of the electron shell displacements and conventional nuclear ones; (v) an appearance of the soliton chiral correlation states; (vi) unconventional magnetic response; (vii) unconventional hyperfine coupling.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据