4.6 Article

Dextran sulfate acts as an endothelial cell protectant and inhibits human complement and natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity against porcine cells

期刊

TRANSPLANTATION
卷 76, 期 5, 页码 838-843

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000078898.28399.0A

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The innate immune system, including complement and natural killer (NK) cells, plays a critical role in activation and damage of endothelial cells (ECs) during xenograft rejection. The semisynthetic proteoglycan analog dextran sulfate (DXS, molecular weight 5,000) is known to inhibit the complement and coagulation cascades. We hypothesized that DXS may act as an EC-protectant preventing complement and NK lysis by functionally replacing heparan sulfate proteoglycans that are shed from the EC surface on activation of the endothelium. Methods. Binding of DXS to ECs, deposition of human complement, cytotoxicity, and heparan sulfate expression after exposure to normal human serum were analyzed by flow cytometry. The efficacy of DXS to protect ECs from xenogeneic NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity was tested in standard Cr-51-release assays. Results. DXS dose-dependently inhibited all three pathways of complement activation. Binding of DXS to porcine cells increased on treatment with human serum or heparinase I and correlated positively with the inhibition of human complement deposition. This cytoprotective effect of DXS was still present when the challenge with normal human serum was performed up to 48 hr after DXS treatment of the cells. DXS incubation of porcine ECs with and without prior tumor necrosis factor-a stimulation reduced xenogeneic cytotoxicity mediated by human NK cells by 47.3% and 25.3%, respectively. Conclusions. DXS binds to porcine cells and protects them from complement- and NK cell-mediated injury in vitro. It might therefore be used as a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent xenograft rejection and has potential for clinical application as an EC protectant.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据