4.6 Article

IL-6 induces NF-κB activation in the intestinal epithelia

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY
卷 171, 期 6, 页码 3194-3201

出版社

AMER ASSOC IMMUNOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3194

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [K01 DK, K08 DK02802, DK01 2792] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IL-6 is a potent proinflammatory cytokine that has been shown to play an important role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). It is classically known to activate gene expression via the STAT-3 pathway. Given the crucial role of IL-6 in the pathogenesis of chronic intestinal inflammation, it is not known whether IL-6 activates NF-kappaB a central mediator of intestinal inflammation. The model intestinal epithelial cell line, Caco2-BBE, was used to study IL-6 signaling and to analyze whether suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (SOCS-3) proteins play a role in the negative regulation of IL-6 signaling. We show that IL-6 receptors are present in intestinal epithelia in a polarized fashion. Basolateral IL-6 and, to a lesser extent, apical IL-6 induces the activation of the NF-kappaB pathway. Basolateral IL-6 stimulation results in a maximal induction of NF-kappaB activation and NF-kappaB nuclear translocation at 2 h. IL-6 induces polarized expression of ICAM-1, an adhesion molecule shown to be important in the neutrophil-epithelial interactions in IBD. Using various deletion constructs of ICAM-1 promoter, we show that ICAM-1 induction by IL-6 requires the activation of NF-kappaB We also demonstrate that overexpression of SOCS-3, a protein known to inhibit STAT activation in response to IL-6, down-regulates IL-6-induced NF-kappaB activation and ICAM-1 expression. In summary, we demonstrate the activation of NF-kappaB by IL-6 in intestinal epithelia and the down-regulation of NF-kappaB induction by SOCS-3. These data may have mechanistic and therapeutic implications in diseases such as IBD and rheumatoid arthritis in which IL-6 plays an important role in the pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据