4.0 Article

Differential Diagnosis of Jakob-Creutzfeldt Disease

期刊

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
卷 69, 期 12, 页码 1578-1582

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamaneurol.79

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institute on Aging [K23AG021989, P01-AG021601, R01-AG031189, P50-AG023501]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [N01-NS-0-2328]
  3. Michael J. Homer Family Fund
  4. National Institutes of Health National Center for Research Resources University of California
  5. San Francisco Clinical and Translational Science Institute [UL1 RR024131]
  6. John Douglas French Alzheimer's Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To identify the misdiagnoses of patients with sporadic Jakob-Creutzfeldt disease (sCJD) during the course of their disease and determine which medical specialties saw patients with sCJD prior to the correct diagnosis being made and at what point in the disease course a correct diagnosis was made. Design: Retrospective medical record review. Setting: A specialty referral center of a tertiary academic medical center. Participants: One hundred sixty-three serial patients over a 5.5-year period who ultimately had pathologically proven sCJD. The study used the subset of 97 patients for whom we had adequate medical records. Main Outcome Measures: Other diagnoses considered in the differential diagnosis and types of medical specialties assessing patients with sCJD. Results: Ninety-seven subjects' records were used in the final analysis. The most common disease categories of misdiagnosis were neurodegenerative, autoimmune/paraneoplastic, infectious, and toxic/metabolic disorders. The most common individual misdiagnoses were viral encephalitis, paraneoplastic disorder, depression, vertigo, Alzheimer disease, stroke, unspecified dementia, central nervous system vasculitis, peripheral neuropathy, and Hashimoto encephalopathy. The physicians who most commonly made these misdiagnoses were primary care physicians and neurologists; in the 18% of patients who were diagnosed correctly at their first assessment, the diagnosis was almost always by a neurologist. The mean time from onset to diagnosis was 7.9 months, an average of two-thirds of the way through their disease course. Conclusions: Diagnosis of sCJD is quite delayed. When evaluating patients with rapidly progressive dementia with suspected neurodegenerative, autoimmune, infectious, or toxic/metabolic etiology, sCJD should also be included in the differential diagnosis, and appropriate diagnostic tests, such as diffusion brain magnetic resonance imaging, should be considered. Primary care physicians and neurologists need improved training in sCJD diagnosis. Arch Neurol. 2012; 69(12): 1578-1582. Published online September 24, 2012. doi:10.1001/2013.jamaneurol.79

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据