4.8 Article

Thrombospondin-4 and its variants - Expression and differential effects on endothelial cells

期刊

CIRCULATION
卷 108, 期 12, 页码 1514-1519

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000089085.76320.4E

关键词

cells, adhesion; cells, proliferation; atherosclerosis; extracellular matrix; endothelium

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01-HL-51614] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K01-DK-62128] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NINDS NIH HHS [R01-NS-38195] Funding Source: Medline
  4. DS NIH HHS [R01-NINDS-43284] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background-In a recent large-scale genetic association study, a single nucleotide polymorphism in the thrombospondin-4 (TSP-4) gene, resulting in a proline-for-alanine substitution at position 387, was associated with a significantly increased risk for premature atherosclerosis. TSP-4 had not previously been implicated in vascular pathology, and very little information is available on its expression and functions. Methods and Results-The goal of this study was to assess TSP-4 expression in vessel wall and to identify differences in functions of TSP-4 variants that could account for the proatherogenic effects of the (P387) TSP-4 variant. TSP-4 expression was demonstrated in human endothelial cells (ECs) and vascular smooth muscle cells from brain blood vessels and coronary arteries. (P387) TSP-4 and its fragment (residues 326 to 722), but not the A(387) forms, suppressed EC adhesion and proliferation. The (P387) TSP-4 was more active in inducing the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, consistent with inhibition of proliferation. Both variant fragments increased the proliferation of human aortic smooth muscle cells. Conclusions-TSP-4 is expressed by vascular cells and influences the vessel wall by modulating the proliferation of ECs and smooth muscle cells. The A387P substitution is a gain-of-function mutation, favoring a form of TSP-4 that interferes with EC adhesion and proliferation and may thereby be proatherogenic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据