4.4 Article

Quantification and glucocorticoid regulation of glucocorticoid receptor transcripts in two human leukemic cell lines

期刊

BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 42, 期 37, 页码 10978-10990

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/bi034651u

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK47211] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have quantified the basal and glucocorticoid-regulated levels of different transcripts from the human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene in the T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell line, CEM-C7, and in the B lymphoblastoid cell line, IM-9. Highly specific quantitative, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays measured total GR transcripts, transcripts encoding the isoforms glucocorticoid receptor alpha (GRalpha) and glucocorticoid receptor beta (GRbeta), and transcripts containing different forms of exon 1: 1A1, 1A2, 1A3, 1B, and 1C. GRalpha and GRbeta transcripts are coordinately upregulated in CEM-C7 cells and coordinately downregulated in IM-9 cells by dexamethasone. The concentration of GRalpha mRNA is more than a 1000-fold higher than that for GRbeta mRNA. Transcripts with different exon 1 forms are all upregulated in CEM-C7 cells and all downregulated in IM-9 cells by dexamethasone, but transcripts containing exons 1A1, 1A2, or 1A3 are regulated to a higher degree than transcripts containing exon 1B or exon 1C. However, exon 1B- and exon 1C-containing transcripts are substantially more abundant than exon 1A-containing transcripts, with exon 1A3-containing transcripts more abundant than exon 1A1-or exon 1A2-containing transcripts. Analysis using models for glucocorticoid receptor autoregulation kinetics suggests that the minor 1A3-containing transcript component could be important for GR protein upregulation, and hence apoptosis, in CEM-C7 cells. These studies suggest that GRalpha transcripts containing exons 1A3, 1B, and 1C contribute most to the intracellular level of GR mRNA and may be the most relevant for steroid-mediated apoptosis in T-lymphoblasts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据