4.0 Article

Association of Antiepileptic Drugs With Nontraumatic Fractures

期刊

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
卷 68, 期 1, 页码 107-112

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.341

关键词

-

资金

  1. Amgen Pharmaceuticals Canada
  2. Merck Frosst
  3. Sanofi-Aventis
  4. Procter Gamble
  5. Novartis
  6. Amgen
  7. Genzyme
  8. Canadian Institutes of Health research [ACB-65731]
  9. Alberta Innovates Health Solutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To explore the relationship between anti-epileptic drug (AED) use and nontraumatic fractures in those aged 50 years and older. Design: Retrospective matched cohort study. Participants: A total of 15 792 persons, identified through the Population Health Research Data Repository from Manitoba, Canada, with nontraumatic fractures of the wrist, hip, and vertebra occurring between 1996 and 2004. Each patient was matched for age, sex, ethnicity, and comorbidity with up to 3 controls (n=47 289). Interventions: Prior AED use (carbamazepine, clonazepam, ethosuximide, felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, pregabalin, primidone, topiramate, valproic acid, and vigabatrin) was determined from pharmacy data in the repository. Odds ratios (OR) for fracture from AED expo-sure were adjusted for sociodemographic and comorbidity factors known to affect fracture risk. Results: A significant increase in fracture risk was found for most of the AEDs being investigated (carbamazepine, clonazepam, gabapentin, phenobarbital, and phenytoin). The adjusted ORs ranged from 1.24 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.47) for clonazepam to 1.91 (95% CI, 1.58-2.30) for phenytoin. The only AED not associated with increased fracture risk was valproic acid (adjusted OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.72). Conclusions: Most AEDs were associated with an increased risk of nontraumatic fractures in individuals aged 50 years or older. Further studies are warranted to assess the risk of nontraumatic fractures with the newer AEDs and to determine the efficacy of osteoprotective medications in this population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据