4.7 Article

Transport and subcellular distribution of intranasally administered zinc in the olfactory system of rats and pikes

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 191, 期 2-3, 页码 97-108

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/S0300-483X(03)00208-7

关键词

olfactory; zinc; rat; pike; axonal transport; metallothionein

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc is an essential element, which can act as a neuromodulator and also is bound in zinc proteins in the brain. The olfactory bulb contains high concentrations of zinc. In the present study, Zn-65(2+) was applied on the olfactory epithelium of rats and pikes and the transport of the metal in the olfactory system was then examined. Administration of Zn-65(2+) in the nasal cavity of rats or the olfactory chambers in pikes resulted in an uptake of the metal in the olfactory epithelium and a transport of the metal along the primary olfactory neurons to their terminations in the olfactory bulbs. Low levels of Zn-65(2+) passed these terminals and continued into the interior of the bulbs. In the rats Zn-65(2+) was also detected in the anterior parts of the olfactory cortex. Subcellular fractionations of the olfactory mucosa and olfactory bulb of rats given Zn-65(2+) intranasally showed that the metal is bound both to particulate cellular constituents and to cytosolic components in these tissues. Gel chromatography indicated that some of the zinc in the cytosol is bound to metallothionein in the olfactory mucosa and bulb. Inhalation of zinc-containing dusts or fumes occurs in some work-places and may imply high exposure of the nasal tissues. It is not known whether neurotoxicity may be related to uptake of zinc in the olfactory system. However, this is an issue which deserves attention, since zinc dysregulation has been implied to play a role in Alzheimer's disease. In addition, impairment of the sense of smell and degenerative changes of the olfactory tissues have been seen in early stages of some neurodegenerative disorders. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据