4.0 Article

The spectrum of parkinsonian manifestations associated with glucocerebrosidase mutations

期刊

ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 1353-1357

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archneur.65.10.1353

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 HG200336-02] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) result in Gaucher disease and can be associated with a phenotype characterized by adult-onset progressive neurologic deterioration and parkinsonism. Objective: To define the clinical and neurologic spectrum of parkinsonian manifestations associated with GBA mutations. Design, Setting, and Patients: A prospective case series of 10 patients (7 men and 3 women) with parkinsonism and GBA mutations evaluated at the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center. Main Outcome Measures: The GBA genotypes were identified by means of DNA sequencing. Tests evaluating neurologic, motor, cognitive, ocular, and olfactory functions were performed and the results were analyzed by a single team. Results: Genotyping identified GBA mutations N370S, L444P, and c.84dupG and recombinant alleles. The mean age at onset of parkinsonian manifestations was 49 years (range, 39-65 years), disease duration was 7.8 years ( range, 1.2-16.0 years), and Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part III score was 26.3 (range, 13-38). Half of the patients reported cognitive changes later in the disease course. Six patients were diagnosed as having Parkinson disease, 3 as having Lewy body dementia, and 1 as having a Parkinson plus syndrome. The most frequent nonmotor finding was olfactory dysfunction. Atypical manifestations included myoclonus, electroencephalographic abnormalities, and seizures. Conclusions: In the homozygous and heterozygous states, GBA mutations are associated with a spectrum of parkinsonian phenotypes ranging from Parkinson disease, mostly of the akinetic type, to a less common phenotype characteristic of Lewy body dementia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据