4.3 Article

Absorption, metabolism and excretion of 3-acetyl DON in pigs

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
卷 57, 期 5, 页码 335-345

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00039420310001607699

关键词

acetyldeoxynivalenols; vomitoxin; trichothecenes; metabolism; pigs; feeding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The absorption, metabolism and excretion of 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-aDON) in pigs were studied. Pigs with a faecal microflora known to be able to de-epoxidate trichothecenes were used in the experiment. The pigs were fed a commercial diet with 3-aDON added in a concentration of 2.5 mg/kg feed for 2.5 days. No traces of 3-aDON or its de-epoxide metabolite were found in plasma, urine or faeces. Deoxynivalenol (DON) was detected in plasma as soon as 20 min after start of the feeding. The maximum concentration of DON in plasma was reached after 3 h and decreased rapidly thereafter. Only low concentrations close to the detection limit were found in plasma 8 h after start of the feeding. A significant part of the DON in plasma was in a glucuronide-conjugated form (42 +/- 7%). No accumulation of DON occurred in plasma during the 60 h of exposure. The excretion of DON was mainly in urine (45 +/- 26% of the toxin ingested by the pigs) and only low amounts of metabolites of 3-aDON (2 +/- 0.4%) were recovered in faeces. De-epoxide DON constituted 52 +/- 15% of the total amount of 3-aDON-metabolites detected in faeces. The remaining part in faeces was DON. DON was still present in the urine and faeces at the end of the sampling period 48 h after the last exposure. The results show that no de-epoxides are found in plasma or urine in pigs after trichothecene exposure, even in pigs having a faecal microflora with a de-epoxidation activity. The acetylated form of the toxin is deacetylated in vivo . Furthermore, the experiment shows that the main part of DON is rapidly excreted and does not accumulate in plasma, but a minor part of the toxin is retained and slowly excreted from the pigs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据