4.6 Article

Long-term specific immune responses induced in humans by a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 lipopeptide-vaccine:: Characterization of CD8+-T-cell epitopes recognized

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 77, 期 20, 页码 11220-11231

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.20.11220-11231.2003

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We studied the effect of booster injections and the long-term immune response after injections of an anti-human immunodeficiency virus type I (HIV-1) Iipopeptide vaccine. This vaccine was injected alone or with QS21 adjuvant to 28 HIV-uninfected volunteers. One month later, after a fourth injection of the vaccine, B- and T-cell anti-HIV responses were detected in >85% of the vaccinated volunteers. One year after this injection, a long-term immune response was observed in >50% of the volunteers. At this point, a positive QS21 effect was observed only in the sustained B-cell and CD4(+)-T-cell responses. To better characterize the CD8(+)-T-cell response, we used a gamma interferon enzyme-linked immunospot method and a bank of 59 HIV-1 epitopes. For the six most common HLA molecules (HLA-A2, -A3, -A11, -A24, -B7 superfamily, and -B8), an average of 10 (range, 3 to 15) HIV-1 epitopes were tested. CD8(+)-T-cell responses were evaluated according to the HLA class I molecules of the volunteers. Each assessment was based on 18 HIV-1 epitopes in average. We showed that 31 HIV-1 epitopes elicited specific CD8(+)-T-cell responses after vaccination. The most frequently recognized peptides were Nef 68-76 (-B7), Nef 71-79 (-B7), Nef 84-92 (-A11), Nef 135-143 (-B7), Nef 136-145 (42), Nef 137-145 (42), Gag 259-267 (-B8), Gag 260-268 (42), Gag 267-274 (42), Gag 267-277 (-B7), and Gag 276-283 (A24). We found that CD8(+)-T-cell epitopes were induced at a higher number after a fourth injection (P < 0.05 compared to three injections), which indicates an increase in the breadth of HIV CD8(+)-T-cell epitope recognition after the boost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据