4.5 Article

Tumour necrosis and microvascular proliferation are associated with 9p deletion and CDKN2A alterations in 1p/19q-deleted oligodendrogliomas

期刊

NEUROPATHOLOGY AND APPLIED NEUROBIOLOGY
卷 29, 期 5, 页码 462-471

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2990.2003.00484.x

关键词

angiogenesis; CDKN2A; deletion; genetic; methylation; microvascular proliferation; mutation; oligodendroglioma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A subset of oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas has been associated with 1p/19q deletion. Subsequently, this genetic alteration was linked to chemosensitivity and classic histology of oligodendrogliomas. Tumoural progression includes deletions of 9p, 10q and alterations of CDKN2A. However, these (epi)genetic changes have not been associated with specific histological features. In a series of 45 gliomas including oligodendrogliomas, oligoastrocytomas and astrocytomas, deletions of chromosomal regions implied in these tumours (1p, 9p, 10, 17p 13, 19q and 22) were looked for by microsatellite analysis. Tumours that were deleted for 1p and 19q were selected. Subsequently, presence of deletions in the other studied regions, (epi)genetic changes in p14(ARF), CDKN2A and CDKN2B, as well as histological features, were associated to these tumours. 1p/19q deletion was observed in 22 tumours. Twenty-one of them presented regions of classic histology of oligodendroglioma. A deletion of 9p was found in eight of them, always in association with tumour necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation. In addition, (epi)genetic alterations of CDKN2A were observed in 71% of these tumours. Presence of regions of classic histology of oligodendroglioma in a tumour sample is predictive of 1p/19q deletions. Necrosis and/or microvascular proliferation are signs of an additional 9p deletion. Finally, as CDKN2A (epi)genetic alterations were found in 71% of the 1p/19q/9p-deleted oligodendrogliomas, CDKN2A may have a role in oligodendroglioma-associated microvascular proliferation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据