4.4 Article

The N-terminal carbohydrate recognition domain of galectin-8 recognizes specific glycosphingolipids with high affinity

期刊

GLYCOBIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 10, 页码 713-723

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwg094

关键词

galectin-8; ganglioside; GM3; sulfoglycosphingolipid; surface plasmon resonance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Galectin-8 is a member of the galectin family and has two tandem repeated carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs). We determined the binding specificities of galectin-8 and its two CRDs for oligosaccharides and glycosphingolipids using ELISA and surface plasmon resonance assays. Galectin-8 had much higher affinity for 3'-O-sulfated or 3'-O-sialylated lactose and a Lewis x-containing glycan than for oligosaccharides terminating in Galbeta1-->3/4GlcNAc. This specificity was mainly attributed to the N-terminal CRD (N-domain), whereas the C-terminal CRD (C-domain) had only weak affinity for a blood group A glycan. The N-domain bound not only to oligosaccharides but also to glycosphingolipids including sulfatide (SM4 s), SM3, sialyl Lc4Cer, SB1a, GD1a, GM3, and sialyl nLc4Cer, suggesting that the N-domain recognizes a 3-O-sulfated or 3-O-sialylated Gal residue. The substitution of the C-3 of the Gal residue in lactose or N-acetyllactosamine with sulfate increased the degree of recognition by galectin-8 more potently than substitution with sialic acid. This is the first demonstration that galectin-8 binds to specific sulfated or sialylated glycosphingolipids with high affinity (K(D)similar to10(-8)-10(-9) M). When the Gln(47) residue of the N-domain was converted to Ala(47), the specific affinity for sulfated or sialylated glycans was selectively lost, indicating that this Gln(47) plays important roles for binding to Neu5Acalpha2-->3Gal or SO3--->3Gal residues. The binding ability of galectin-8 to membrane-associated GM3 was confirmed using CHO cells, which predominantly express GM3. Binding of CHO cells to the mutein was significantly lower than to the N-domain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据