4.2 Article

Surfactant properties of purified polyglycerol monolaurates

期刊

JOURNAL OF SURFACTANTS AND DETERGENTS
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 331-337

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11743-003-0278-x

关键词

CMC; detergency; foam; polyglycerol ester; polyglycerol monolaurate; surface activity; surfactant property

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of purified polyglycerol monolaurates (PGML), such as di-, tri-, tetra-, and pentaglycerol monolaurates, were synthesized, and their surfactant properties in aqueous solutions were examined. The surfactant properties of PGML were compared with those of n-dodecyl polyoxyethylene monoethers (C12EOn) to examine the function of the hydrophilic part of these compounds. The critical micelle concentration (CMC) values and the surface tension at CMC of PGML and C12EOn increased linearly with an increase in the number of glycerol and oxyethylene units, respectively; the slope of the increase was greater for PGML than C12EOn. The minimum surface area per molecule of PGML was smaller than that of C12EOn at the air/aqueous solution interface. The initial foam heights of the surfactants at the CIVIC increased with an increase in the number of glycerol or oxyethylene units, and the foam heights of PGML were consistently higher and more stable than those of C12EOn. Detergency depended on a reduction in interfacial tension. Triglycerol monolaurate showed the lowest interfacial tension and the highest detergency among all the surfactants tested. Overall, the PGML showed better performance in all the surfactant properties tested than C12EOn. It is noteworthy that the surfactant properties of PGML having few glycerol units (di- to tetraglycerol monolaurates) are on par with those of C12EOn having many oxyethylene units (hexa- and octaoxyethylene). These results suggest that PGML having a secondary hydroxyl group on every glycerol unit of the hydrophilic part could be more hydrophilic than C12EOn; this characteristic feature guaranteed the superior surfactant properties of PGML.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据