4.5 Article

In vitro system to evaluate oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs:: Simultaneous analysis on dissolution and permeation of drugs

期刊

PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
卷 20, 期 10, 页码 1674-1680

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1023/A:1026107906191

关键词

Caco-2 monolayers; intestinal absorption; dissolution; permeation; poorly water-soluble drug; in vitro-in vivo correlation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. The aim of the present work was to develop a new in vitro system to evaluate oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs by utilizing Caco-2 monolayers. Methods. Caco-2 monolayer was mounted between side-by-side chambers, which enabled the simultaneous assay of dissolution and permeation of drugs (dissolution/permeation system; D/P system). Apical and basal sides of the chamber were filled with buffer solutions. Drugs were applied to the apical side as powder, suspension, or solution, and then, the permeated amounts into the basal side were monitored for 2 h. At the same time, dissolved amounts of drugs at the apical side were detected. The amount of drug applied to the D/P system was based on its in vivo clinical dose. Results. Sodium taurocholate (5 mM, apical side) and bovine serum albumin (4.5% w/v, basal side) increased the permeated amount of poorly water-soluble drugs. Both additives were considered to be effective at mimicking in vivo conditions of intestinal drug absorption. From the correlation between the permeated amount of 13 drugs (% dose/2 h) in the D/P system and their percentage dose absorbed in humans in vivo, this system was found to be useful in evaluating oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs. Conclusions. With attempts made to mimic the physiologic conditions of the human GI tract, in vivo oral absorption of drugs was quantitatively assessed in the D/P system in vitro. This system is quite useful to predict the oral absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs after administration as solid dosage forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据