4.6 Article

Maternal cardiac function in twin pregnancy

期刊

OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
卷 102, 期 4, 页码 806-815

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00807-X

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

OBJECTIVE: To investigate maternal cardiac function in twin pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 119 pregnant women with twin pregnancies at 10-40 weeks', gestation. Two-dimensional and M-mode echocardiography of the left ventricle was performed in the left lateral decubitus position to assess left ventricular longitudinal and transverse systolic function. The measurements were compared with those obtained from 128 women with singleton pregnancies previously reported. RESULTS: In twin pregnancies, compared with singletons, maternal cardiac output was greater by 20% (P < .001), because of a greater stroke volume (15%,P < .001) and heart rate (3.5%; P = .04). Furthermore, in women with twins there were greater left ventricular end-diastolic and left ventricular end-systolic dimensions left ventricular mass (13.5%; P < .001), fractional shortening (3%; P =.04), and ejection fraction (2.5%; P =.04). Mean arterial pressure and global time to shortening in women with twins, compared with singletons, were less in die first trimester by approximately 2%, but after midpregnancy they increased Progressively, so that at term the measurements were greater by 3% and 5.7%, respectively (P = .03). Conversely, long axis shortening in women with twins, compared with singletons, was greater in the first trimester by approximately 6.5%, but at term it was 3% less (P = .01). Twin pregnancies that subsequently developed preeclampsia had a hemodynamic profile similar to the rest of the twin population. CONCLUSION: Twin pregnancy is characterized by an even more hyperdynamic circulation than singleton pregnancy. Left ventricle longitudinal systolic function and mean arterial pressure arc more abruptly affected after 20 weeks compared with singleton pregnancies. (C) 2003 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据