4.6 Article

Novel RPGR mutations with distinct retinitis pigmentosa phenotypes in French-Canadian families

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 136, 期 4, 页码 678-687

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00331-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

PURPOSE: To characterize the molecular defects in two x-linked retinitis pigmentosa (RP) families. We hypothesized that different RPGR mutations result in distinct RP phenotypes. DESIGN: Observational case series. METHODS: Fifteen members in family I and three members in family II were evaluated. Full ophthalmic evaluations were done. Linkage analyses were performed and likelihood of odds scores (LOD score) were calculated. For mutation analyses, we used dHPLC and auto. mated sequencing. RESULTS: Two novel RPGR mutations were identified in the two families; a Glu 414 (2-bp del) frameshift mutation in family I and an IVS 2-1 (g to a) splice site mutation in family II. All male family members in family I were severely affected by RP but maintained central visual acuities until their 50s and did not develop a bull's eye maculopathy. The female phenotype was highly variable. Some of the carriers exhibited a severe phenotype, one female displayed an asymmetric phenotype, and other carriers were asymptomatic. All members with the RPGR frameshift mutation exhibited rod,cone electroretinograms abnormalities, whereas five members had hearing loss. Male members of family II were severely affected, with early visual acuity loss, central scotomas, and bull's eye maculopathy. The female family members were asymptomatic but displayed cone-rod electroretinograms changes. There was no hearing loss. CONCLUSIONS: Different RPGR mutations lead to distinct RP phenotypes, with a highly variable inter- and intrafamilial phenotypic spectrum of disease that is associated with the type of mutation in RPGR and nonrandom X chromosome inactivation, respectively. (C) 2003 by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据