4.7 Article

Prevalence of malnutrition in 1760 patients at hospital admission: a controlled population study of body composition

期刊

CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 22, 期 5, 页码 473-481

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/S0261-5614(03)00049-9

关键词

malnutrition; bioelectrical impedance analysis; fat-free mass; body fat; albumin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Malnutrition, defined as low or excessive body weight, is associated with increased hospital length of stay and cost of care. The purpose of this study was to determine if fat-free mass (FFM) and body fat (BF) differed between patients at hospital admission in Geneva and Berlin and healthy volunteers, and if there is a difference in the prevalence of low FFM (percentile P < 10) and high BF (percentile P > 90) between patients and volunteers. Methods: In total, 1760 patients (Geneva: 525 men, 470 women; Berlin: 397 men, 368 women) were evaluated for malnutrition by BMI, serum albumin, and FFM and BF, determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and compared to 1760 healthy volunteers matched for age and height, and further compared to FFM and BF percentiles, previously determined in 5225 healthy adults. Results.-The prevalence of FFM P < 10 was greater in patients than controls. The prevalence of albumin < 35 g/l (14.9% and 11.2% in Geneva and Berlin patients, respectively) and BMI < 20.0 kg/m(2) was lower than the prevalence of low FFM (31.3% and 17.3%, respectively). The prevalence of high BF in Berlin patients was three-fold the prevalence of volunteers. Twelve and twenty percent of Geneva and Berlin patients, respectively, with normal BMI had high BF, compared to 4% of volunteers. Conclusions: Geneva and Berlin patients had lower FFM and higher BF than age-and height-matched volunteers and a higher prevalence of low FFM and high BF. Serum albumin and BMI underestimated the prevalence of malnutrition in patients at hospital admission. Body composition measurements identified patients with low FFM and low or high BF reserves. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据