4.6 Article

Stable expression of chimeric anti-CD3 receptors on mammalian cells for stimulation of antitumor immunity

期刊

CANCER GENE THERAPY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 779-790

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700637

关键词

T lymphocytes; single-chain antibodies; CD80; CD86; CD3; immunotherapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Expression of CD80 or CD86 costimulatory molecules on tumor cells can produce rejection of immunogenic but not poorly immunogenic tumors. We have previously shown that anti-CD3 single-chain antibodies expressed on the surface of cells can directly activate T cells. We therefore investigated whether anti-CD3 receptors could enhance CD86-mediated rejection of poorly immunogenic tumors. Expression of anti-CD3 receptors on cells was increased by introduction of membrane-proximal spacer domains containing glycosylation sites between the single-chain antibody and the transmembrane domain of the chimeric receptors. Removal of glycosylation sites in the spacer reduced surface expression due to increased shedding of chimeric receptors from the cell surface. Induction of T-cell proliferation by anti-CD3 receptors did not correlate with the expression level of chimeric protein, but rather depended on the physical properties of the spacer. Anti-CD3 receptors effectively induced T-cell cytotoxicity, whereas coexpression with CD80 or CD86 was required for generating T-cell proliferation and IL-2 secretion. Although expression of CD86 did not significantly delay the growth of poorly immunogenic B16-F1 tumors, expression of anti-CD3 receptors with CD86 produced complete tumor rejections in 50% of mice and induced significant protection against wild-type B16-F1 tumor cells. Our results show that spacer domains can dramatically influence the surface expression and the biological activity of chimeric antibody receptors. The strong antitumor activity produced by anti-CD3 receptors and CD86 on tumor cells indicates that this strategy may be beneficial for the gene-mediated therapy of poorly immunogenic tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据