4.4 Review

Estrogen and other female reproductive risk factors are not strongly associated with the development of rheumatoid arthritis in elderly women

期刊

SEMINARS IN ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 72-82

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0049-0172(03)00084-2

关键词

rheumatoid arthritis; estrogen; prospective cohort; reproductive risk factors

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA 39741] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: Endogenous and exogenous reproductive hormones have been associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in women, but data are inconsistent and no studies have assessed RA risk factors exclusively in elderly women. Methods: The authors examined the association between reproductive factors, exogenous hormone exposure, and RA in a prospective cohort study of 31,336 Iowa women who were aged 55 to 69 years at cohort baseline in 1986. Results: During 11 years of follow-up, 158 incident cases of RA were identified and validated. Age at last pregnancy (P trend = .01) and age at menopause (P trend = .03) were inversely associated with RA, whereas a history of polycystic ovary syndrome (relative risk [RR], 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 6.30), endometriosis (RR, 1.72; 95% CI, 0.93 to 3.18), and former use of hormone replacement therapy (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04 to 2.06) were positively associated with RA. In multivariate analysis models, a history of polycystic ovary syndrome remained the most consistent predictor of RA, whereas the RRs for other factors attenuated. Conclusion: Few reproductive factors showed a strong or statistically significant association with RA in elderly women. The association of polycystic ovary syndrome may be indicative of perturbations of endocrine-immune activity that may influence the development of RA. This prospective cohort study adds to the understanding of the potential contribution of hormonal factors to the cause of RA in older women. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据