4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

PPAR gamma inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2, PGE(2) synthase, and inducible nitric oxide synthase in cardiac myocytes

期刊

HYPERTENSION
卷 42, 期 4, 页码 844-850

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.HYP.0000085332.69777.D1

关键词

myocytes; nitric oxide synthase; cyclooxygenase; prostaglandins

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [P01-HL-28982] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are ligand-activated transcription factors belonging to the nuclear receptor superfamily. They regulate lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis, cell proliferation, and differentiation and modulate inflammatory responses. We examined whether PPARgamma is functional in cultured neonatal ventricular myocytes and studied its role in inflammation. Western blots revealed PPARgamma in myocytes. When myocytes were transfected with a PPAR response element reporter plasmid (PPRE-TK-luciferase), the PPARgamma activator 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15dPGJ(2)) increased promoter activity, whereas cotransfection of a dominant negative PPARgamma inhibited it. To determine the role of 15dPGJ(2) in expression of proinflammatory genes, we tested its effect on interleukin-1beta induction of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). 15dPGJ(2) decreased interleukin-1beta stimulation of COX-2 by 40% and PGE(2) production by 73%. We next questioned whether 15dPGJ(2) was modulating the expression of inducible prostaglandin E-2 synthase (PGES) and found that it completely blocked interleukin-1beta induction of PGES. Use of a second PPARgamma agonist, troglitazone, and the selective PPARgamma antagonist GW9662 demonstrated that the effects seen were PPARgamma-dependent. In addition, we found that 15dPGJ(2) blocked interleukin-1beta stimulation of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS). We concluded that 15dPGJ2 may play an anti-inflammatory role in a PPARgamma-dependent manner, decreasing COX-2, PGES, and PGE(2) production, as well as iNOS expression.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据