4.5 Article

Dynamics of ovarian development in the FORKO immature mouse: Structural and functional implications for ovarian reserve

期刊

BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION
卷 69, 期 4, 页码 1281-1293

出版社

SOC STUDY REPRODUCTION
DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.103.015552

关键词

androgen receptor; estradiol receptor; follicle-stimulating hormonereceptor; granulosa cells; ovary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adult Follitropin Receptor Knockout (FORKO) female mice are infertile and estrogen deficient. In order to understand the peri/postnatal developmental changes, we have now characterized the structural and molecular aberrations by comparing several markers of follicular development in 2-, 10-, and 24-day-old wild-type and FORKO females. By Day 24, FORKO mice have 40%-50% smaller uteri and vaginas. Estradiol is undetectable but testosterone and LH levels are already elevated at this age. FORKO ovaries are 45% smaller, indicating a postnatal or perinatal deficit consequent to FSH receptor ablation. This is attributable to decreased numbers of growing follicles and reduced diameter. Developmental markers, such as Mullerian inhibiting substance, GATA-4, estrogen receptor P, and androgen receptor, were differentially expressed in granulosa cells. In the 2-day-old mutant neonates, a faster recruitment process was noted that later slowed down, impeding development of follicles. This is noteworthy in light of the controversy regarding the direct role of FSH/receptor system as a determinant of small and preantral follicle development in rodents. As the pool of nongrowing primordial follicles specifies the duration of female fertility and timing of reproductive senescence, we believe that the postnatal FORKO female mouse could help in exploring the signals that impact on early folliculogenesis. In addition, our data suggest that the FSH/receptor system is a major contributor to the formation and recruitment of the nongrowing pool of follicles as early as Postnatal Day 2 in the mouse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据