4.8 Article

Photovoltaic Performance and Interface Behaviors of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 Solar Cells with a Sputtered-Zn(O,S) Buffer Layer by High-Temperature Annealing

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 7, 期 31, 页码 17425-17432

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b04815

关键词

Cu(In,Ga)Se-2; Zn(O,S); bottom cell; thermal annealing depth profiling energy band alignment

资金

  1. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (MSIP)
  2. Korea Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology (ISTK)
  3. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) - Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy, Republic of Korea [20123030010030, 20153010011990]
  4. Technology Innovation Program - Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy (MOTIE) [10047001]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20123030010030, 20153010011990] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We selected a sputtered-Zn(O,S) film as a buffer material and fabricated a Cu(In,Ga)Se-2 (CIGS) solar cell for use in monolithic tandem solar cells. A thermally stable buffer layer was required because it should withstand heat treatment during processing of top cell. Postannealing treatment was performed on a CIGS solar cell in vacuum at temperatures from 300-500 degrees C to examine its thermal stability. Serious device degradation particularly in V-OC was observed, which was due to the diffusion of thermally activated constituent elements. The elements In and Ga tend to out-diffuse to the top surface of the CIGS, while Zn diffuses into the interface of Zn(0,S)/CIGS. Such rearrangement of atomic fractions modifies the local energy band gap and band alignment at the interface. The notch-shape induced at the interface after postannealing could function as an electrical trap during electron transport, which would result in the reduction of solar cell efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据