4.5 Article

Can immune parameters be used as predictors to distinguish between pulmonary multidrug-resistant and drug-sensitive tuberculosis?

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL SCIENCE
卷 6, 期 1, 页码 77-82

出版社

TERMEDIA PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2010.13511

关键词

HLA-DR; gamma delta T cell; NK-T cell; multidrug-resistant tuberculosis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Despite the development and wide implementation of Directly Observed Therapy Strategies (DOTS), multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) remains a serious global health threat. In this study, the role of host immune response in patients with MDR-TB is investigated and compared with that of patients with smear-positive drug-sensitive tuberculosis (SP-TB) Material and methods: 27 patients with SP-TB, 20 patients with MDR-TB, and 20 healthy controls were included in the study. Immune parameters were determined by flow cytometry using monoclonal antibodies in order to compare the percentage values of these markers in the two study groups and the control group Results: The levels of lymphocyte subgroups in the gate of CD45(+)/CD14(-) lymphocyte CD45(+), CD3(+), CD4(+), NK, CD3/HLA-DR, CD 95(+) cells were significantly lower, by contrast CD23(+), CD25(+), CD19(+), CD4(+)/CD8(+), HLA-DR cells were found to be lower, but not significantly so in patients with MDR-TB, compared to levels in patients in the SP-TB and control groups Besides these findings, the levels of NKT cells and gamma delta TCR(+) cells were significantly higher in the MDR-TB than in the healthy control and SP-TB group Conclusions: The lower levels of CD3/FILA-DR, CD4 (+), Fas (+), and NK, and the higher level of NKT together with T cells in patients with MDR-TB compared to those in SP-TB may indicate a profound immune suppression in MDR-TB patients and thereby may denote an accumulation in the bacterial load Our findings may shed light on the pathogenesis and prognosis of MDR tuberculosis, and may point towards the use of flow cytometry findings as an aid to early diagnosis in MDR-TB patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据