4.7 Article

The effect of brain tumor angiogenesis on the in vivo relationship between the gradient-echo relaxation rate change (ΔR2*) and contrast agent (MION) dose

期刊

JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING
卷 18, 期 4, 页码 397-403

出版社

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.10371

关键词

susceptibility contrast; calibration factor; tumor angiogenesis; gradient echo; relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV)

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA82500] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [P01 MH51358] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: To determine in vivo if the susceptibility calibration factor for gradient-echo imaging (k(G)), which characterizes the relationship between the tissue T2* relaxation rate change (DeltaR2*) and tissue contrast agent concentration, is independent of tissue type and condition; in addition, to assess the consequences of such an assumption on the use of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measurements as a direct index of tumor angiogenesis. Materials and Methods: The DeltaR2* was measured as a function of monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticles (MION) contrast agent dose in a rat brain tumor (9L gliosarcoma) model, the blood volume fraction independently measured, and k(G) calculated and compared for the normal gray matter, normal white matter, tumor, and contralateral brain. Results: The kG was found to be the same for gray and white matter (P = 0.53), but statistically different for tumor compared to contralateral brain (P = 0.005) with k(GTumor) < k(GBrain). Conclusion: The gradient-echo calibration factor, k(G), is the same for brain gray and white matter, but not the same for brain and tumor tissue. This difference may be attributed to the grossly different vascular morphology of tumors, dueto tumor angiogenesis, compared to normal brain and/or possibly differing blood rheological factors such as hematocrit. Consequently, the sensitivity to blood volume differences between tumor and normal brain tissue may be lessened when using gradient-echo susceptibility contrast agent methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据