4.6 Article

Alteration of Telomere Length and Subtelomeric Methylation in Human Endothelial Cell Under Different Levels of Hypoxia

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 43, 期 1, 页码 15-20

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2012.02.001

关键词

Hypoxia; Telomere; Subtelomere; DNA methylation; Telomerase; Endothelial cell

资金

  1. NSFC [81170329/H2501]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture of Japan [23590885]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23590885] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims. Hypoxia-associated changes of telomeric structure in cell cultures have been analyzed mainly in cancer cells, stem cells, or cells transduced with vectors containing the telomerase gene, but not in somatic cells. The stability of telomere structure has been reported to be associated with subtelomeric methylation status. However, there are no reports of epigenetic alterations of telomeric regions of human somatic cells under hypoxia. This study aims at detecting and analyzing the subtelomeric methylation status in human somatic cells cultured under hypoxia. Methods. Mean telomere length and telomerase activity of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) cultured in hypoxic conditions were measured. Subtelomeric methylation status of these cells was assessed by genomic Southern blot with telomere DNA probe using methylation-sensitive and -insensitive isoschizomers, MspI and HpaII. Results. The telomerase activity in HUVECs correlated inversely with the oxygen concentration. Mild hypoxia (10 or 15% oxygen) increased the telomere lengths, whereas the telomere lengths did not appear to change when <1% O-2. The subtelomere of the shortest telomere range was methylated the most at 1% O-2. Conclusions. Subtelomeric hypermethylation of short telomeres at 1% O-2 compared to milder hypoxia implied that the subtelomeric hypermethylation may yield telomere stability and favor the cell survival of short telomere-bearing cells. (C) 2012 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据