4.6 Article

Umbilical Cord Blood Cells CD133+/CD133-Cultivation in Neural Proliferation Media Differentiates Towards Neural Cell Lineages

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 555-562

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.10.003

关键词

Umbilical cord blood; Magnetic cell sorting; CD133 cells; Neural lineage

资金

  1. MVTS COST BM [1-0674-09, 2/0114/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) has been identified as a good source of hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic stem cells that can be easily isolated. In the present study we investigated the possibility of whether stern cells in mononuclear UCB grown under defined conditions can produce progeny with neural phenotype. Methods. A combination of antigen-driven magnetic cell sorting (MACs) method and defined culture conditions specific for cells of neural lineages were used for isolation, expansion and differentiation of CD133+/- cells from UCB. Both UCB-derived fractions were expanded by exposure to growth factors (EGF, bFGF). Differentiation was induced by replacing them with fetal bovine serum. Using immunocytochemistry, the cell markers for neural (MAP2, GFAP, RIP) and non-neural lineages (S-IOU, von Willebrand factor) were detected. Results. The analysis revealed occurrence of fully mature neural and non-neural lineages, which showed qualitative and quantitative differences between population of CD133+ and CD133- cells. The expression levels of MAP2 and RIP in CD133+ were significantly higher than in CD I 33, more GFAP positive cells were found in the CD133-. At the same time, S-100 was expressed by 32.47 +/- 6.24% of CD133- cells and 29.42 +/- 1.32% of CD133- cell expressed a von Willebrand factor antigen. Conclusions. Our results indicate that stem cells derived from umbilical cord blood are easy to obtain, proliferate and are able to differentiate towards the cells of neural lineages, which represents a promising way for their utilization in cell-based therapies for CNS injuries and diseases. (C) 2011 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据