4.6 Article

Immunothodulatory Activities of Chitin Microparticles on Leishmania major-infected Murine Macrophages

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 572-576

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.11.005

关键词

Chitin; Leishmania major; Macrophages; Nitric oxide; TNF-alpha

资金

  1. M.Sc. thesis of Fatemeh Dehghani
  2. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (SBMU)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Chitin microparticles (CMPs) are found to be potent macrophage stimulators; however, their immunomodulatory effects on the parasite-infected macrophages have not yet been studied. To address this issue, we used a Leishmania major-infected murine macrophage model and characterized the regulatory effects of CMPs on the parasite-infected cells. Methods. Mouse peritoneal macrophages were prepared and infected with L. major (MRHO/IR/1975/ER) standard strain. Following cell treatment with CMPs (500 mu g/mL) for 48 h, percent of infected macrophages was determined by Giemsa staining and compared with untreated cells. To find the potential mechanisms of the activity of CMPs, TNF-alpha and accumulated nitrite in the culture supernatants of the treated and untreated cells were also measured by ELISA and colorimetric Griess assays, respectively. Results. According to the obtained results, chitin microparticles reduced the ex vivo parasite infectivity by similar to 12%. However, this inhibitory effect was not directly related to the increased biosynthesis and release of nitric oxide (NO) by macrophages. Instead, we observed a significant increase in the level of TNF-alpha secretion due to cell treatment with CMPs. Interestingly, this overexpression of TNF-alpha did not impair cell viability, suggesting the anti-apoptotic effects of the CMPs. Conclusions. These findings show that chitin microparticles have immunomodulatory effects on L. major-infected macrophages and further provide motivations for future studies on their in vivo effects. (C) 2011 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据