4.6 Article

Early Cataract Formation Due to Galactokinase Deficiency: Impact of Newborn Screening

期刊

ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 7, 页码 608-612

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2011.11.004

关键词

Cataract; Galactose; Galactose-1-phosphate; Dietary treatment; Galactokinase; Galactosemia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background and Aims. Galactokinase (GALK) deficiency is an autosomal recessive disorder causing cataract formation that can be prevented or mitigated by early diagnosis and galactose-restricted diet. The aim of this retrospective study was to explore whether GALK-deficiency meets the criteria for neonatal mass screening programs. Methods. From 2000 until 2010, the Screening Laboratory Hannover performed newborn screening in 1,950,927 infants from Germany for galactosemia by measuring galactose-1-phosphate-uridyl-transferase and total galactose concentration (free galactose plus galactose-1-phosphate), including automatic screening for GALK deficiency. Results. Eleven cases were found with elevated galactose levels accompanied by normal transferase activity. Nine of 11 cases were informative; the diagnosis was established by demonstrating deficient activity of the GALK enzyme in erythrocytes. To our knowledge, screening did not produce any false negative results. All patients were treated with a galactose-restricted diet from the neonatal period or infancy. Three of nine patients suffered from congenital cataracts or eventual development of cataracts, despite normal galactose concentrations in blood. Conclusions. Newborn screening for GALK deficiency prevents or at least mitigates cataract formation. As screening for GALK deficiency is technically simple, it seems to be reasonable to include this disorder in routine screening programs by simultaneous determination of transferase activity and quantification of galactose plus galactose-1-phosphate in dried blood spots. (C) 2011 IMSS. Published by Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据