4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Calpain inhibitor prevented apoptosis and maintained transcription of proteolipid protein and myelin basic protein genes in rat spinal cord injury

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL NEUROANATOMY
卷 26, 期 2, 页码 119-124

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-0618(03)00044-9

关键词

spinal cord injury; apoptosis; calpain; calpain inhibitor; myelin basic protein; proteolipid protein

资金

  1. NINDS NIH HHS [NS41088, NS31622, NS38146] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is associated with progressive neurodegeneration and dysfunction. Multiple cellular and molecular mechanisms are involved in this pathogenesis. In particular, the activation of proteases following trauma can cause apoptosis in the spinal cord. Calpain, a calcium-dependent cysteine protease, plays a major role in apoptosis following trauma. We identified apoptosis and decrease in transcription of the genes for proteolipid protein (PLP) and myelin basic protein (MBP) in five 1-cm long spinal cord segments (S1, distant rostral; S2, near rostral; S3, lesion; S4, near caudal; and S5, distant caudal) 24 h after induction of SO (40 g-cm force) in rats by weight-drop method. Sham rats underwent laminectomy and did not receive injury. Internucleosomal DNA fragmentation occurred prominently in the lesion (S3), moderately in near segments (S2 and S4), and slightly in distant segments (S1 and S5) of injured rats, indicating the occurrence of apoptosis in the lesion and penumbra. Levels of transcription of PLP and MBP were reduced highly in the lesion and moderately in near segments, suggesting that apoptotic loss of cells impaired biosynthesis of two important structural components of myelin. Immediate administration of the calpain inhibitor E-64-d (1 mg/kg) to injured rats prevented apoptosis and restored transcription of these genes, indicating the therapeutic efficacy of calpain inhibitor for treatment of SCI. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据