4.7 Article

The impact of a physician awareness group and the first year of training on hematology-oncology fellows

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
卷 21, 期 19, 页码 3676-3682

出版社

AMER SOC CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2003.12.014

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose : To assess the impact of a Balint-like physician awareness group on hematology-oncology fellows' attitudes and measure changes in attitudes during the first fellowship year. Patients and Methods: We used a modified crossover design in which one half of a fellowship class at a time was exposed to the group intervention over a 2-year period, (2000 to 2002). Two 14-fellow classes were followed for 1 year each and were given three attitudes questionnaires, at the beginning, middle, and end of the academic year. Results: Forty Balint group sessions were held during the 2-year study period; 82 questionnaires of the 84 administered (98%) were recovered. Instrument content and criterion validity were demonstrated, as was topic domain reliability. Overall, mean attitude scores increased following the group intervention, from 3.6 (95% Cl, 3.5 to 3.7) to 3.7 (95% Cl, 3.6 to 3.8; P = .09). Within domains, scores increased in a fellow's views of him/herself as a physician, from 3.8 (95% Cl, 3.6 to 3.9) to 4.1 (95% Cl, 3.9 to 4.2; P = .008) and comfort dealing with emotional patient/ clinical situatioris, from 3.5 (95% Cl, 3.3 to 3.7) to 3.7 (95% Cl, 3.6 to 3.9; P = .11). Changes in responses to individual questions included: an increase in fellows' comfort with the technical aspects of being an oncologist (P < .03); an increase in fellows' comfort with discussing the stress of home at work (P < .023); and an increase among fellows in feeling pressed for time to discuss psychosocial issues with patients (P = .035). Conclusion: A physician awareness group was feasible and enhanced fellows' development as physicians. Further research is needed to determine how to incorporate such groups into oncology fellowships. (C) 2003 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据