4.6 Article

Transduction of the IL-21 and IL-23 genes in human pancreatic carcinoma cells produces natural killer cell-dependent and -independent antitumor effects

期刊

CANCER GENE THERAPY
卷 10, 期 10, 页码 771-778

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sj.cgt.7700630

关键词

IL-21; IL-23; pancreatic cancer; natural killer cells; gene therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We examined whether novel cytokines, interleukin (IL)-21 and IL-23, that were expressed in tumors could produce antitumor effects in the inoculated mice. Human pancreatic cancer AsPC-1 cells were retrovirally transduced with murine IL-21 or IL-23 (p19-linked p40) gene (AsPC-1/IL-21, AsPC-1/IL-23) and were injected into nude or severe combined immunodeficiency ( SCID) mice. Although the proliferation in vitro of the transduced cells remained the same as that of parent cells, growth of AsPC-1/IL-21 and AsPC-1/IL-23 tumors developed in nude mice was retarded compared with that of parent tumors. Treatment of nude mice with anti-asialo GM(1) antibody temporally abrogated the growth retardation of AsPC-1/IL-21, but not AsPC-1/IL-23 tumors; however, the growth of AsPC-1/IL-21 tumors came to be retarded thereafter with the regeneration of natural killer (NK) cells. The growth of AsPC-1/IL-21 tumors developed in SCID mice was also retarded compared with parent tumors and the growth retardation was abrogated by treatment with anti-asialo GM(1) antibody. The growth of AsPC-1/IL-23 tumors in SCID mice was not different from that of parent tumors. Cytotoxic activity and secretion of interferon-gamma in response to AsPC-1 cells were induced in spleen cells of the mice bearing AsPC-1/IL-21 or AsPC-1/IL-23 tumors. When nude mice were injected with a mixed population of AsPC-1/IL-21 and AsPC-1/IL-23 cells, no synergistic effects were observed. These data collectively suggest that expression of IL-21 and IL-23 in tumors can produce NK cell-dependent and -independent antitumor effects in an alphabeta T cell-defective condition, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据