4.2 Article

Evidence of Estrogenic effect by the three-month-intervention of isoflavone on vaginal maturation and bone metabolism in early postmenopausal women

期刊

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
卷 50, 期 5, 页码 613-619

出版社

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.50.613

关键词

postmenopausal women; isoflavone; vaginal differentiation; bone metabolism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective of the present study is to determine the estrogenic effect of isoflavone on vaginal epithelia and bone metabolism in early postmenopausal women. Twenty-two postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to either a group that was given isoflavone extract (61.8 mg) for three months or a control group that was given placebo. We measured the L2-4 bone mineral density (BMD) before and 3 months after treatment by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Blood and urine samples were obtained from the women before and 3 months after treatment. We measured FSH using radioimmunoassay and, urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline levels by HPLC. For endocrine cytology, vaginal smears were collected before and 3 months after the treatment. Three months after the treatment, the serum FSH levels and the BNID values did not significantly differ between the two groups. Urinary excretion of isoflavone was significantly higher in the group given isoflavone compared with that given placebo (p<0.03). Numbers of parabasal and intermediate types of cells were significantly decreased (58.2 +/- 12.4% to 25.0 +/- 10.7%; p<0.05) and increased (24.1 +/- 18.7% to 63.7 +/- 10.7%; p<0.05), respectively in the isoflavone group, but remained unchanged in the control group. Urinary pyridinoline excretion was significantly decreased (49.6% vs. before, p<0.01 by paired t-test) in the isoflavone group. The intake of 60 mg of isoflavone daily for 3 months produced maturational changes of vaginal epithelia without affecting serum FSH levels, and could possibly slow down bone turnover rates as judged by decreased urinary pyridinoline excretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据