4.6 Article

Kallikrein gene delivery attenuates cardiac remodeling and promotes neovascularization in spontaneously hypertensive rats

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.01129.2002

关键词

hypertension; cardiac hypertrophy; cardiac fibrosis; angiogenesis

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [HL-29397] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypertension that results in left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and/or fibrosis can lead to cardiac dysfunction. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) develop high blood pressure and LV hypertrophy at an early age and are a popular model of human essential hypertension. To investigate the role of the tissue kallikrein-kinin system in cardiac remodeling, an adenovirus containing the human tissue kallikrein gene was injected intravenously into adult SHR and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats. The blood pressure of WKY rats remained unchanged throughout the experiment. Alternatively, kallikrein gene transfer reduced blood pressure in SHR for the first 2 wk, but had no effect from 3 to 5 wk. Five weeks after kallikrein gene delivery, SHR showed significant reductions in LV-to-heart weight ratio, LV long axis, and cardiomyocyte size; however, these parameters were unaffected in WKY rats. Interestingly, cardiac collagen density was decreased in both SHR and WKY rats receiving the kallikrein gene. Kallikrein gene transfer also increased cardiac capillary density in SHR, but not in WKY rats. The morphological changes after kallikrein gene transfer were associated with decreases in JNK activation as well as transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels in the heart. In addition, kallikrein gene delivery elevated LV nitric oxide and cGMP levels in both rat strains. These results indicate that kallikrein-kinin attenuates cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis and enhances capillary growth in SHR through the suppression of JNK, TGF-beta1, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 via the nitric oxide-cGMP pathway.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据