4.7 Article

Focal and lateralized subcortical abnormalities in unipolar major depressive disorder: An automated multivoxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy study

期刊

BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY
卷 54, 期 7, 页码 744-750

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3223(02)01908-X

关键词

multivoxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy; caudate; putamen; choline; N-acetyl-L-aspartate; major depression

资金

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [K08 MH01460] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The results of prior proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-1-MRS) studies in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) evaluating choline (Cho)/ creatine (Cr) and N-acetyl-L-aspartate (NAA)/Cr ratios are mixed. These single-voxel or one-dimensional chemical-shift imaging (CSI) nonautomated H-1-MRS studies has been unable to evaluate global or lateralized abnormalities in neuronal or membrane function. Using automated multivoxel two-dimensional CSI H-1-MRS techniques, we tested the hypothesis that patients with MDD have focal neuronal and membrane abnormalities localized in the subcortical region. Methods: Whole brain and subcortical measures of Cho, NAA, Cr, and myo-inositol (ml) were obtained in 18 patients with MDD and 20 control subjects using automated two-dimensional CSI H-1-MRS. Results: Compared with control subjects, MDD patients had a significantly lower mean NAA/Cr amplitude in the caudate and a significantly higher mean Cho/Cr amplitude in the putamen, particularly on the right side. No differences were observed for global whole brain measurements. Conclusions: The findings support reduced neuronal viability or function in the caudate and altered membrane phospholipid metabolism in the putamen for patients with MDD. Our results are consistent with prior magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, and postmortem reports of focal and lateralized abnormalities of the basal ganglia in MDD. (C) 2003 Society of Biological Psychiatry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据