4.6 Article

Expanding the indications for pulmonary valve replacement after repair of tetralogy of Fallot

期刊

ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY
卷 76, 期 4, 页码 1066-1071

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)00748-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. Insertion of a competent pulmonary valve has been advocated to reduce right ventricular volume overload associated with pulmonary regurgitation (PR) after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. However the indications, proper timing, and long-term benefits of restoring pulmonary valve function remain controversial. Methods. Thirty-six patients (aged 15.2 +/- 9.2 years) underwent pulmonary valve implantation (31 homografts, 5 heterografts) 12.2 +/- 6.9 years after tetralogy repair. Additional surgical procedures included pulmonary artery augmentation (n = 14), closure of septal defects (n = 10), and cryoablation and endocardial resection of ventricular tachycardia (n = 2). Results. All patients have had clinical improvement in their exercise capacity. Preoperative and postoperative bicycle ergometry tests in 6 patients demonstrated significant improvement in the percent of predicted peak workload (68.5% +/- 19.8% to 80.7% +/- 17.4%, p < 0.015). One midterm death occurred in a 38-year-old patient with a history of ventricular tachycardia who died suddenly 2 years after pulmonary valve insertion. Postoperative echocardiographic measurements were available in 34 patients at a mean follow-up of 5 years. There was a 30% reduction in right ventricular end-diastolic diameter indexed to body surface area after surgery (30.1 +/- 10.2 to 18.6 +/- 6.0 mm/m(2), p < 0.0001). Two patients required conduit replacements at 1 and 9 years postoperatively. Conclusions. Timely insertion of a competent pulmonary valve in children, adolescents, and young adults with significant PR after tetralogy of Fallot repair results in subjective and objective improvement in exercise capacity and is associated with reduction in right ventricle size. (C) 2003 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据