4.0 Article

Use of Varenicline for 4 Weeks Before Quitting Smoking Decrease in Ad Lib Smoking and Increase in Smoking Cessation Rates

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 171, 期 8, 页码 770-777

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.138

关键词

-

资金

  1. Pfizer
  2. United Kingdom Centre for Tobacco Control Studies
  3. Cancer Research United Kingdom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The use of varenicline tartrate alleviates postquit withdrawal discomfort, but it also seems to reduce the reward associated with smoking. The current treatment schedule, which commences 1 week before quitting, relies primarily on the first mechanism. We set out to determine whether increasing the prequit medication period renders cigarettes less satisfying and facilitates quitting. Methods: One hundred one smokers attending a stop-smoking clinic in London, United Kingdom, were randomly allocated to receive varenicline for 4 weeks before the target quit date (TQD) or to receive placebo for 3 weeks before the TQD, followed by varenicline for 1 week before the TQD. In both groups, standard varenicline treatment was given for 3 months after the TQD. Measures included smoking satisfaction and smoke intake before quitting, urges to smoke and withdrawal discomfort after quitting, and sustained abstinence from the TQD to 3 months. Results: Varenicline preloading reduced prequit enjoyment of smoking (P=.004) and smoke intake (P <.001), with 36.7% of participants reducing their cotinine concentrations by more than 50% (reducers). Varenicline preloading did not affect postquit withdrawal symptoms, but it increased 12-week abstinence rates (47.2% in the varenicline arm vs 20.8% in the placebo arm, P=.005). The effect was particularly strong among the reducers in the varenicline arm (66.7% in reducers vs 22.6% in nonreducers, P=.002). Varenicline preloading was well tolerated. Conclusions: Although several issues remain to be clarified, varenicline preloading can generate a substantial reduction in ad lib smoking and enhance 12-week quit rates. Current treatment schedules may lead to suboptimal treatment results. Trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to corroborate these findings.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据