3.8 Article

Reduced expression of FOXC2 and brown adipogenic genes in human subjects with insulin resistance

期刊

OBESITY RESEARCH
卷 11, 期 10, 页码 1182-1191

出版社

NORTH AMER ASSOC STUDY OBESITY
DOI: 10.1038/oby.2003.163

关键词

gene expression; facultative energy expenditure; precursor cell commitment; adipose cell mass; insulin action

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: We investigated subcutaneous adipose tissue expression of FOXC2 and selected genes involved in brown adipogenesis in adult human subjects in whom we have previously identified a reduced potential of precursor cell commitment to adipose-lineage differentiation in relation to insulin resistance. Research Methods and Procedure: Gene expression was studied using quantitative real time polymerase chain reaction. The relation between the expression of brown adipogenic genes and the genes involved in progenitor cell commitment, adipose cell size, and insulin sensitivity in vivo was analyzed. Results: The expression of FOXC2, MASK, MAP3K5, retinoblastoma protein (pRb), peroxisome proliferator-activated protein gamma (PPARgamma), and retinoid X receptor gamma (RXRgamma) was decreased in the insulin-resistant compared with insulin-sensitive subjects, whereas PPARgamma-2 and CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPalpha) showed no differential expression. The FOXC2 expression correlated with that of Notch and Writ signaling genes, as well as of the genes studied participating in brown adipogenesis, including MASK, MAP3K5, PPARgamma, pRb, RXRgamma, and PGC-1. A second-level correlation between PPARgamma and UCP-1 was also significant. In addition, the expression of MASK, MAP3K5, pRb, RXRgamma, and PGC-1 inversely correlated with adipose cell mass and also correlated with the glucose disposal rate in vivo. Discussion: Our results suggest that a reduced brown adipose phenotype is associated with insulin resistance and that a basal brown adipose phenotype may be important for maintaining normal insulin sensitivity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据