4.0 Article

Simplification of the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index for Prognostication in Patients With Acute Symptomatic Pulmonary Embolism

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 170, 期 15, 页码 1383-1389

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.199

关键词

-

资金

  1. Sanofi-Aventis Spain
  2. Bayer Schering Pharma
  3. [FIS 08/0200]
  4. [SEPAR 2008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PEST) estimates the risk of 30-day mortality in patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE): We constructed a simplified version of the PESI. Methods: The study retrospectively developed a simplified PESI clinical prediction rule for estimating the risk of 30-day mortality in a derivation cohort of Spanish outpatients. Simplified and original PEST performances were compared in the derivation cohort. The simplified PEST underwent retrospective external validation in an independent multinational cohort (Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad Tromboembolica [RIETE] cohort) of outpatients. Results: In the derivation data set, univariate logistic regression of the original 11 PEST variables led to the removal of variables that did not reach statistical significance and subsequently produced the simplified PESI that contained the variables of age, cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and oxyhemoglobin saturation levels. The prognostic accuracy of the original and simplified PESI scores did not differ (area under the curve, 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-0.80]). The 305 of 995 patients (30.7%) who were classified as low risk by the simplified PESI had a 30-day mortality of 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0%-2.1%) compared with 10.9% (8.5%-13.2%) in the high-risk group. In the RIETE validation cohort, 2569 of 7106 patients (36.2%) who were classified as low risk by the simplified PESI had a 30-day mortality of 1.1% (95% CI, 0.7%-1.5%) compared with 8.9% (8.1%-9.8%) in the high-risk group. Conclusion: The simplified PESI has similar prognostic accuracy and clinical utility and greater ease of use compared with the original PESI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据