4.6 Article

Role of fibroblast growth factor type 1 and 2 in carbon tetrachloride-induced hepatic injury and fibrogenesis

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 163, 期 4, 页码 1653-1662

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63522-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. Intramural NIH HHS [Z01 DK047039] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCI NIH HHS [CA59971, R01 CA059971] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK35310, R01 DK035310] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genomic ablation of hepatocyte-specific fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)4 in mice revealed a role of FGF signaling in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism and hepatolobular restoration in response to injury without effect on liver development or hepatocyte proliferation. Although the potential role of all 23 FGF polypeptides in the liver is still unclear, the most widely studied prototypes, FGF1 and FGF2, are present and have been implicated in liver cell growth and function in vitro. To determine whether FGF1 and FGF2 play a role in response to injury and fibrosis, we examined the impact of both acute and chronic exposure to carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) in the livers of FGF1- and FGF2-deficient mice. After acute CCl4 exposure, FGF1(-/-)FGF2(-/-) mice exhibited an accelerated release of serum alanine aminotransferase similar to FGFR4 deficiency, but no effect on overall hepatolobular restoration or bile acid metabolism. FGF1(-/-)FGF2(-/-) mice exhibited a normal increase in a-smooth muscle actin and desmin associated with activation and migration of hepatic stellate cells to damage, but a reduced level of hepatic stellate cell-derived matrix collagen alpha1(I) synthesis. Liver fibrosis resulting from chronic M, exposure was markedly decreased in the livers of FGF1/FGF2-deficient mice. These results suggest an agonist role for FGF1 and FGF2 in specifically insult-induced liver matrix deposition and hepatic fibrogenesis and a potential target for the prevention of hepatic fibrosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据