4.6 Article

Sleep-disordered breathing in nonobese diabetic subjects with autonomic neuropathy

期刊

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 4, 页码 654-660

出版社

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.03.00070402

关键词

autonomic neuropathy; control of breathing; diabetes; sleep apnoea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess the occurrence and nature of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in 26 adult, nonobese diabetics (18 with autonomic neuropathy (DAN+) (age 45 (41-50) yrs; body mass index (BMI) 24.1 (22-26) kg.m(-2)) and eight without autonomic neuropathy (DAN-) (age 45 (35-55) yrs; BMI 24.8 (23-26) kg.m(-2))) overnight full sleep I studies and measurements of central and peripheral carbon dioxide (CO2) chemosensitivity were performed. DAN+ were divided in two subgroups, according to the presence (DAN+PH+; n=10) or absence (DAN+PH-; n=8) of postural hypotension. Ten normal subjects were studied as controls (age 42 (36-48) yrs; BMI 24.4 (23-25) kg.M-2). In contrast to DAN- and controls, who did not show SDB, five DAN+ (four DAN+PH- and one DAN+PH+) had an apnoea/hypopnoea index greater than or equal to10 and four DAN+ (two DAN+PH- and two DAN+PH+) had an apnoea index greater than or equal to5. All the events were obstructive, occurring mainly during rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. Ten DAN+ exhibited a mean lowest oxygen saturation <90% during REM sleep. No periodic breathing or central sleep apnoeas were found in DAN+PH+, although. they had an enhanced central chemoresponsiveness to CO2. Both DAN+ subgroups showed a marked reduction in peripheral CO2 chemosensitivity. In conclusion, adult nonobese diabetics with autonomic neuropathy, independent of the severity of their dysautonomy, have obstructive sleep apnoea/hypopnoea with a frequency >30%. A decrease in peripheral carbon dioxide chemosensitivity prevents adult nonobese diabetics with autonomic neuropathy and postural hypotension from experiencing posthyperventilatory central sleep apnoea, despite an increased hypercapnic central drive.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据