4.4 Article

Antisense inhibition of Escherichia coli RNase P RNA:: Mechanistic aspects

期刊

CHEMBIOCHEM
卷 4, 期 10, 页码 1049-1056

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cbic.200300675

关键词

antisense agents; DNA; oligonucleotides; RNA; RNase P

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ribonucleoprotein enzyme RNase P catalyzes endonucleolytic 5'-maturation of tRNA primary transcripts in all domains of life. The indispensability of RNase P for bacterial cell growth and the large differences in structure and function between bacterial and eukaryotic RNase P enzymes comply with the basic requirements for a bacterial enzyme to be suitable as a potential novel drug target. We have identified RNA oligonucleotides that start to show an inhibitory effect on bacterial RNase P RNAs of the structural type A (for example, the Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae enzymes) at a subnanomolar concentrations in our in vitro precursor tRNA (ptRNA) processing assay. These oligonucleotides are directed against the so-called P15 loop region of RNase P RNA known to interact with the 3'-CCA portion of ptRNA substrates. Lead probing experiments demonstrate that a complementary RNA or DNA 14-mer fully invades the P15 loop region and thereby disrupts local structure in the catalytic core of RNase P RNA. Bindin of the RNA 14-mer is essentially irreversible because of a very low dissociation rate. The association rate of this oligonucleotide is on the order of 10(4) M-1 s(-1) and is thus comparable to those of may other artificial antisense oligonucleotides. The remarkable inhibition efficacy is attributable to the dual effect of direct interference with substrate binding to the RNase P RNA active site and induction of misfolding of the catalytic core of RNase P RNA. Based on our findings, the P15 loop region of bacterial Rnase P RNAs of the structural type A can be considered the Achilles' heel of the ribozyme and therefore represents a promising target for combatting multiresistant bacterial pathogens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据