4.0 Article

National Trends in Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, 1994-2007

期刊

ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 168, 期 19, 页码 2088-2094

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.168.19.2088

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [K08 HS15699-01Al]
  2. National Heart, Lung, and Blood institute [K24 HL086703]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Diabetes mellitus is common, Costly, and increasingly prevalent. Despite innovations in therapy, little is known about patterns and costs of drug treatment. Methods: We used the National Disease and Therapeutic Index to analyze medications prescribed between 1994 and 2007 for all US office visits among patients 35 years and older with type 2 diabetes. We used the National Prescription Audit to assess medication costs between 2001 and 2007. Results: The estimated number of patient visits for treated diabetes increased from 25 million (95% confidence interval [C1], 23 million to 27 million) in 1994 to 36 million (95% Cl, 34 million to 38 million) by 2007. The mean number of diabetes medications per treated patient increased from 1.14 (95% CI, 1.06-1.22) in 1994 to 1.63 (1.54-1.72) in 2007. Monotherapy declined from 82% (95% CI, 75%-89%) of visits during which a treatment was used in 1994 to 47% (43%-51%) in 2007. Insulin use decreased from 38% of treatment visits in 1994 to a nadir of 25% in 2000 and then increased to 28% in 2007. Sulfonylurea use decreased from 67% of treatment visits in 1994 to 34% in 2007. By 2007, biguanides (54% of treatment visits) and glitazones (thiazolidinediones) (28%) were leading therapeutic classes. Increasing use of glitazones, newer insulins, sitagliptin phosphate, and exenatide largely accounted for recent increases in the mean cost per prescription ($56 in 2001 to $76 in 2007) and aggregate drug expenditures ($6.7 billion in 2001. to $1.2.5 billion in 2007). Conclusions: Increasingy complex and costly diabetes treatments are being applied to an increasing population. The magnitude of these rapid changes raises concerns about whether these more costly therapies will result in proportionately improved outcomes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据