4.6 Article

Protein kinase Cα phosphorylates and negatively regulates diacylglycerol kinase ζ

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 278, 期 41, 页码 39542-39547

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M307153200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diacylglycerol kinase (DGK) terminates diacylglycerol (DAG) signaling by phosphorylating DAG to produce phosphatidic acid, which also has signaling properties. Thus, precise control of DGK activity is essential for proper signal transduction. We demonstrated previously that a peptide corresponding to the myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate ( MARCKS) phosphorylation site domain (PSD) in DGKzeta was phosphorylated in vitro by an active fragment of protein kinase C (PKC). In the present study, we tested full-length DGKzeta and found that PKCalpha phosphorylated DGKzeta on serines within the MARCKS PSD in vitro and in vivo. DGKzeta also coimmunoprecipitated with PKCalpha, suggesting that they reside in a regulated signaling complex. We then tested whether phosphorylation affected DAG kinase activity. We found that a mutant ( DGKzeta S/D) in which serines within the MARCKS PSD were altered to aspartates ( to mimic phosphorylation) had lower activity compared with wild-type DGKzeta or a control mutant (DGKzeta S/N) in which the same serines were changed to asparagines. Furthermore, activation of PKCalpha by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate inhibited the activity of wild-type DGKzeta, but not DGKzeta S/D, in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. These results suggest that by phosphorylating the MARCKS PSD, PKCalpha attenuates DGKzeta activity. Supporting this, we found that cells expressing DGKzeta S/D had higher DAG levels and grew more rapidly compared with cells expressing DGKzeta S/N that could not be phosphorylated. Taken together, these results indicate that PKCalpha phosphorylates DGKzeta in cells, and this phosphorylation inhibits its kinase activity to remove cellular DAG, thereby affecting cell growth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据