4.7 Article

Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide production by Drosophila mitochondria

期刊

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 938-948

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0891-5849(03)00464-7

关键词

insect; glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; complex I; complex III; reverse electron transport; matrix; hydrogen peroxide; free radicals

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [SF19106] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [SF19106] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Drosophila melanogaster is a key model organism for genetic investigation of the role of free radicals in aging, but biochemical understanding is lacking. Superoxide production by Drosophila mitochondria was measured fluorometrically as hydrogen peroxide, using its dependence on substrates, inhibitors, and added superoxide dismutase to determine sites of production and their topology. Glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase and center o of complex III in the presence of antimycin had the greatest maximum capacities to generate superoxide on the cytosolic side of the inner membrane. Complex I had significant capacity on the matrix side. Center i of complex III, cytochrome c, and complex IV produced no superoxide. Native superoxide generation by isolated mitochondria was also measured without added inhibitors. There was a high rate of superoxide production with sn-glycerol 3-phosphate as substrate; two-thirds mostly from glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase on the cytosolic side and one-third on the matrix side from complex I following reverse electron transport. There was little superoxide production from any site with NADH-linked substrate. Superoxide production by complex I following reverse electron flow from glycerol 3-phosphate was particularly sensitive to membrane potential, decreasing 70% when potential decreased 10 mV, showing that mild uncoupling lowers superoxide production in the matrix very effectively. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据